Blacksmith's valuation jumps nearly 10x in under a year as AI coding fuels software testing

A $45M Series B values the AI code-testing startup at $550M, nearly 10x its year-ago mark.

2 min
Blacksmith's valuation jumps nearly 10x in under a year as AI coding fuels software testing

AI tools like Cursor, Codex, and Claude Code can now write code faster than ever. The bottleneck has shifted from writing software to proving it works, and a startup built around that problem is suddenly worth a lot more money.

Blacksmith, founded in 2024, said it has raised a $45 million Series B led by Peak XV Partners at a $550 million valuation. That is close to ten times the $60 million mark it carried when it closed a $10 million Series A less than a year earlier. Existing investors GV and Y Combinator also joined the round, bringing total funding to $58.5 million.

The company helps teams build, test, and verify code before it ships. Co-founder and CEO Aditya Jayaprakash said Blacksmith now serves more than 5,000 customers, including Mercury, Supabase, Clerk, Ashby, and Expensify, up from just over 700 a year ago.

Blacksmith's valuation jumps as AI coding grows

Why testing, not writing, became the constraint

The rise of AI coding assistants made generating code dramatically easier, but the quality of that output is not guaranteed. "Validating code is still a bottleneck, and it's an even bigger bottleneck because people are writing even more," Jayaprakash said.

Blacksmith began as a cloud provider for continuous integration, the pipeline that runs builds and tests before code reaches production. It has since expanded with Codesmith, an AI coding agent that can automatically fix failed checks.

Jayaprakash said the company reached a $10 million annualized revenue run rate with about 10 employees, has grown to roughly 30 people, and now generates "tens of millions of dollars" in revenue. He declined to give an exact updated figure but said some of its largest customers spend more than $1 million a year on the platform.

A crowded field

Blacksmith is not alone. Its competitors include GitHub Actions, Cursor Automations, and validation features baked into Codex and Claude Code, along with a set of other startups and the AI code-testing services offered by Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud. Jayaprakash said Blacksmith is competing on test speed and price.

Looking ahead, he said the company plans to broaden into a wider suite of coding tools aimed at helping developers write, validate, and merge software faster.

Why it matters

The funding shows where the money is moving in the AI developer-tools market. As models lower the cost of producing code, the expensive, slow work of checking that code is shifting to agents. Startups that can make validation both fast and affordable are attracting the valuations usually reserved for the model makers themselves.

Sources:

Written by

More to read

  • Anthropic Demonstrates Autonomous De Novo Protein Design and Chemical Analysis with Claude

    Anthropic Demonstrates Autonomous De Novo Protein Design and Chemical Analysis with Claude Anthropic has published experimental results demonstrating Claude's ability to autonomously design de novo protein binders with physical wet-lab validation and automate complex analytical chemistry workflows. The findings show frontier LLMs acting as autonomous agents across computational biology and molecular characterization pipelines. In the primary experiment, Anthropic evaluated Claude Mythos Previe

    1 min
  • Cerebras Unveils CS-4 Rack-Scale System Powered by Three WSE-3 Turbo Chips and Nexus Architecture

    Cerebras Unveils CS-4 Rack-Scale System Powered by Three WSE-3 Turbo Chips and Nexus Architecture Cerebras Systems has announced the CS-4, a rack-scale AI accelerator system designed around three of its next-generation Wafer Scale Engine 3 Turbo (WSE-3 Turbo) chips and a modular hardware architecture dubbed Nexus. Cerebras confirmed that initial customer shipments for the CS-4 are scheduled to begin in the current quarter. The new system marks a structural shift from Cerebras's single-wafer CS

    1 min
  • AI FinOps: Cutting LLM Inference Costs by 30-60% Through Model Tiering, Caching, and GPU Optimization

    AI FinOps: Cutting LLM Inference Costs by 30-60% Through Model Tiering, Caching, and GPU Optimization Inference costs have become the second-largest line item in enterprise AI budgets, trailing only talent spend according to RapidData's State of Enterprise AI 2026. This shift represents a fundamental inversion from the 2021-2023 era when training dominated AI expenditure. The compounding nature of serving costs—accumulating every hour as long as users hit the API—means that even modest producti

    1 min